How successful were the three Round Table Conference of 1930-1932?



Q:-How successful were the three Round Table Conference of 1930-1932? [14]
Answer:-
Round Table Conferences were successful only to some extent. The Round Table Conferences were held in London in 1930, 1931 and 1932. But neither Gandhi nor Jinnah attended all of them.

The Round Table Conferences were held to consider the ‘Simon Commission Report’ and to suggest reforms to solve the constitutional problem of India. On the whole the Conferences did not achieve much and the constitutional problem was not resolved.

The First Round Table Conference (1930) was successful in the sense that it was agreed that Federal System of government would be adopted for India and responsible representative government would be set up in provinces. This was a great achievement because the Congress had suggested ’Unitary Form’ of government in provinces was a good step forward for self-rule. But Congress did not attend this conference because congress leaders were in jail on account of non-cooperation movement. 

Secondly, the princely states also agreed to join the federation. Also several committees were formed to discuss different issues.

The Second Round Table Conference (1931) was attended by the Congress with high hopes of progress. Mr. Gandhi represented the Congress but he declared that the Congress was the only political party which could speak for all the Indian people. He also declared that there was no minority problem in India. Muslims and other minority leaders did not agree with Mr. Gandhi. Therefore on account of Mr. Gandhi stubborn and unfair attitude the conference could not achieve much but its success was that it was declared that Orissa, NWFP and Sind (after separation from Bombay) would be given full provincial status. The minorities issue remained unresolved.  

The Third Round Table Conference was held in November 1932. It was again not attended by Congress. Mr. Jinnah also did not attend. The Conference proved to be a mere formality. It only finalized the reports and broke up without achieving anything of substance.

In the light of above facts, it can be said that although the Round Table Conference did not achieve much on the whole, yet the first conference of 1930 was more successful than the other two. 

38 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. It actually is if this is the question your looking for... I recently bought the history past paper book and this answer is pretty much the same.

      Delete
    2. bro chill the fk down aint nobody here to prove u things and if it isnt go do your freaking work urself.

      Delete
  2. Jinnah appeared in the round table conference but backed up because he thought that some ground was gained by the muslims..He was present in the first round table conference.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Madarchode bakwas na sat sahi hai ghasti phuddi ke

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  3. i find it according to the pattern n helpful....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Replies
    1. Go to google and buy a domain then with the help of a data base manager set up a site as you wish and pay 200-1000 depending on site to google per month

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It is not fully written 14 mark question should be of 2 and a half pages

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes your right but not nessasary as in history marking is done through level marking so points complete even if 1 page full marks

      Delete
    2. I wrote this as my answer and it came on two and half pages so please write this in your answer and you will know that you are saying wrong in comments

      Delete
  7. My question was “why did round table Conferences failed in reaching a continuational settlement?”

    ReplyDelete
  8. Are a even human????
    thanks for this all... very very helpful
    besy website ever seen of pak st mashall
    may allah bless u and make enter paradise!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am not criticising but it is not up to the mark for Cambridge Exam History 2059/1

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Then please provide the better answer.
      -Admin

      Delete
    2. Ammar amir then look for a better answer elsewhere what the fuck are you doing here? U SOAB

      Delete
    3. This answer is even helping people till today 2021

      Delete
  11. Thank you it really help me out!😊

    ReplyDelete
  12. Madar chod ghasti puddi ke ma lun Dale kanjar Teri ama ki kusss harami bc gandu nasja yaha see fucking bastard

    ReplyDelete
  13. Iam not censureing but points are missing in the answer

    ReplyDelete
  14. some points are missing in your answer but rest was all helpful

    ReplyDelete